Syncswap (Scroll) Crypto Exchange Review: Is It Worth Using in 2025?

SyncSwap on Scroll isn’t what you’d call a household name in crypto - not yet. But if you’re already on the Scroll network, you’ve probably seen it pop up as one of the few DEX options available. The question isn’t whether it works - it does. The real question is: should you use it?

What Is SyncSwap (Scroll)?

SyncSwap (Scroll) is a decentralized exchange built specifically for the Scroll blockchain, an Ethereum Layer 2 that uses zkRollup technology to cut costs and speed up transactions. It’s not a standalone product - it’s one branch of the larger SyncSwap ecosystem, which also lives on zkSync Era, Linea, Taiko, and Sophon. The Scroll version launched in 2023 and is still in its early stages.

Unlike centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, SyncSwap doesn’t hold your money. You trade directly from your wallet - MetaMask, Rabby, or any Web3 wallet connected to Scroll. There’s no KYC, no sign-up, no middleman. That’s the whole point of DeFi. But here’s the catch: while the concept is solid, the execution on Scroll is shaky.

How It Works: Simple on Paper, Frustrating in Practice

Using SyncSwap (Scroll) starts with bridging ETH or other tokens from Ethereum mainnet to Scroll. That’s a 5-15 minute process using Scroll’s official bridge. Once your funds are on Scroll, you connect your wallet to SyncSwap’s interface and start swapping.

The interface looks clean. The layout is familiar - similar to Uniswap. You pick a token, pick the one you want to trade for, and click swap. Simple, right?

But here’s where things go wrong for a lot of users. If you’re trying to buy Scroll’s native token, SCR, you’re in for trouble. Multiple users on the Scroll Governance Forum reported failed transactions even after bumping gas limits to 2x the recommended amount. One user, DeFiNewbie42, tried three times in October 2025 - all failed. Another said they got “insufficient gas” errors despite having more than enough ETH in their wallet.

Why? Because liquidity on SyncSwap (Scroll) is thin. There are only 8 coins and 10 trading pairs available as of November 2025. Compare that to Skydrome, Scroll’s top DEX, which offers 28 coins and 45 trading pairs. When liquidity is low, price slippage spikes. DeFiLlama data from September 2025 shows SyncSwap (Scroll) has 30-40% higher slippage than Skydrome on the same pairs.

Costs: The Real Win

If you’re looking to save on gas, SyncSwap (Scroll) delivers. Swaps cost between $0.02 and $0.05 on average - that’s 98% cheaper than trading the same tokens on Ethereum mainnet, where Uniswap swaps often run $1.50-$2.50. That’s the power of zkRollup: it bundles hundreds of transactions into one proof, slashing fees.

Transaction finality is also fast - 1 to 3 minutes, compared to 12+ minutes on Ethereum. That’s a real improvement for traders who hate waiting.

SyncSwap also uses variable fee tiers (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.30%), like Uniswap V3, letting liquidity providers choose where to put their funds. But here’s the problem: most pools on Scroll are tiny. Average pool sizes are $150K-$300K. Skydrome’s are $500K-$1.2M. Smaller pools mean less depth, more volatility, and more risk for traders.

Contrasting DEXs on Scroll: weak SyncSwap vs. vibrant Skydrome with abundant liquidity

Security: Audited, But Not Proven

SyncSwap’s smart contracts are audited by Scroll’s internal security team. That’s better than nothing. But there’s no public, independent audit report for the Scroll version - unlike its zkSync counterpart, which had multiple third-party reviews. That’s a red flag for cautious users.

DeFi security expert Mikhail Ivanov warned in a November 2025 CoinDesk interview: “Multi-chain DEX deployments risk spreading security resources too thin.” SyncSwap is trying to be everywhere at once - zkSync, Scroll, Linea, Taiko. But doing that well requires serious resources. Right now, Scroll looks like the neglected child.

Compared to Skydrome: The Real Alternative

On Scroll, Skydrome isn’t just another DEX - it’s the dominant one. It controls about 45% of the network’s trading volume, according to Dune Analytics (October 2025). It has more liquidity, more tokens, and better user feedback.

Here’s a quick comparison:

SyncSwap (Scroll) vs. Skydrome on Scroll (November 2025)
Feature	SyncSwap (Scroll)	Skydrome (Scroll)
Trading Pairs	10	45
Supported Tokens	8	28
Average TVL per Pool	$150K-$300K	$500K-$1.2M
Slippage (Low-Liquidity Pairs)	30-40% higher	Baseline
SCR Token Support	Unreliable	Stable
User Reviews	0 on FxVerify	Dozens of positive reports

Unless you’re specifically chasing a SYNC token airdrop, there’s no good reason to pick SyncSwap over Skydrome on Scroll. Skydrome just works better.

SYNC Token Airdrop: The Only Real Incentive

The only reason anyone might stick with SyncSwap (Scroll) right now is the rumored SYNC token airdrop. MEXC Blog reported in October 2025 that active users across all SyncSwap networks - including Scroll - could qualify for future token distribution. The Token Generation Event (TGE) is expected in Q4 2025.

That’s speculative, of course. No official roadmap confirms this. And even if it happens, you’d need to trade consistently across zkSync, Scroll, and other chains to maximize your chances. Most users won’t do that. They’ll just use the DEX that’s easiest.

Crypto hunter reaching for SYNC airdrop while users abandon SyncSwap for Skydrome

Who Should Use SyncSwap (Scroll)?

Only three types of people should consider SyncSwap (Scroll) right now:

SYNC token hunters - if you’re willing to trade across multiple chains for a potential future reward.
Early adopters - you believe in Scroll’s long-term potential and want to support its ecosystem, even if it’s messy.
Traders needing cross-chain sync - if you use SyncSwap on zkSync and want identical UI and features across networks.

Everyone else? Use Skydrome. It’s faster, deeper, and doesn’t randomly fail when you try to buy SCR.

What’s Next for SyncSwap (Scroll)?

SyncSwap’s team announced a V3 upgrade for all networks, including Scroll, scheduled for January 2026. They promise “improved liquidity management” and “cross-chain swap functionality.” That sounds promising - if it actually happens.

But here’s the reality: Layer 2 DEXs are consolidating. Coin Bureau’s November 2025 analysis found that the top 3 DEXs now control over 75% of volume on major L2s. SyncSwap (Scroll) isn’t in the top 3 on Scroll. It’s barely in the top 5.

If the V3 update doesn’t fix liquidity, token support, and transaction reliability, SyncSwap (Scroll) could fade into irrelevance - just another abandoned experiment in the crowded Layer 2 graveyard.

Final Verdict: Don’t Use It Unless You Have to

SyncSwap (Scroll) isn’t broken. It’s just underdeveloped. The tech works. The fees are low. The interface is fine. But the liquidity? The token support? The user experience? All of it is thin, unreliable, and frustrating.

For now, it’s better as a backup option - not your main DEX. If you’re on Scroll and want to trade, go with Skydrome. It’s proven. It’s stable. It’s got real volume.

SyncSwap (Scroll) feels like a beta version that got released too early. Maybe in 2026, after V3 and if SYNC tokens drop, it’ll improve. But as of December 2025, it’s not worth the hassle.

Is SyncSwap (Scroll) safe to use?

SyncSwap (Scroll) uses smart contracts audited by Scroll’s internal team, but there’s no public, third-party audit report for this version. That’s a risk. It’s safer than unverified contracts, but not as secure as platforms like Skydrome, which have more transparent security reviews. Avoid putting large sums in it until independent audits are published.

Why can’t I buy SCR on SyncSwap (Scroll)?

Liquidity for SCR on SyncSwap (Scroll) is extremely low. Many users report failed transactions even with high gas limits. The liquidity pools either don’t have enough SCR, or the price feed is inaccurate. Try Skydrome instead - it’s the only DEX on Scroll where buying SCR works reliably.

How does SyncSwap (Scroll) compare to Uniswap on Ethereum?

SyncSwap (Scroll) is much cheaper - swaps cost $0.02-$0.05 vs. $1.50-$2.50 on Uniswap. It’s also faster, with finality in 1-3 minutes instead of 12+. But Uniswap has hundreds of tokens and deep liquidity. SyncSwap (Scroll) has only 8 coins. Use SyncSwap (Scroll) for low-cost trades on Scroll. Use Uniswap for broader access and reliability.

Do I need to bridge my ETH to use SyncSwap (Scroll)?

Yes. SyncSwap (Scroll) only works on the Scroll network. You must first bridge your ETH or ERC-20 tokens from Ethereum mainnet to Scroll using Scroll’s official bridge. That process takes 5-15 minutes and costs a small fee (under $1). You can’t connect your wallet directly from Ethereum.

Will I get a SYNC token airdrop if I use SyncSwap (Scroll)?

Possibly. MEXC Blog and other sources suggest active users across all SyncSwap networks - including Scroll - may qualify for a future SYNC token distribution. But there’s no official confirmation, no rules, and no timeline. Don’t trade on SyncSwap (Scroll) just for this. It’s a gamble, not a guarantee.

Is SyncSwap (Scroll) better than Skydrome?

No. Skydrome has more liquidity, more tokens, fewer failed trades, and better user feedback. SyncSwap (Scroll) is newer, has less volume, and is more prone to errors. Unless you’re chasing a SYNC airdrop, Skydrome is the clear choice for trading on Scroll.

If you’re on Scroll and want to trade, don’t waste time with SyncSwap unless you’re specifically hunting for SYNC tokens. Use Skydrome. It’s the real deal. SyncSwap might catch up - but right now, it’s still a work in progress.

Comments

roxanne nott

syncswap on scroll is just a ghost town. tried buying SCR 5 times, gas was fine, still failed. skydrome works. why even bother?

December 20, 2025 at 08:22

Dustin Bright

lol i feel you. i thought i was doing something wrong, but nope. it's just dead liquidity. i switched to skydrome and now my trades actually go through. 🙌

also, the interface looks nice but it's like a fancy empty restaurant. pretty plates, no food.

December 20, 2025 at 23:54

Mmathapelo Ndlovu

it's funny how we keep building these beautiful DeFi interfaces but forget the most important part: people need to be able to actually trade.

syncswap feels like a prototype that got shipped because someone had a deadline. i get the vision, but execution matters more than aesthetics. skydrome is the quiet hero here.

December 21, 2025 at 14:44

vaibhav pushilkar

syncswap's fee structure is solid, but liquidity is everything. if you can't swap without 40% slippage, the low gas doesn't matter.

stick with skydrome. it's not sexy, but it works.

December 22, 2025 at 10:01

Kevin Karpiak

you guys are being too soft. this isn't 'underdeveloped' - it's a failure. scroll is already losing users to opbnb and arbitrum. why are we even giving this thing oxygen?

syncswap is a distraction. kill it with fire.

December 24, 2025 at 09:28

Sarah Glaser

there’s a deeper truth here: the crypto ecosystem is collapsing under the weight of too many chains and too many clones.

syncswap isn’t failing because of bad code - it’s failing because no one cares enough to make it matter. liquidity follows attention, and attention has already moved to skydrome.

we’re not building the future - we’re just repainting the same broken house over and over.

maybe the real innovation isn’t another DEX, but asking why we keep building them.

December 25, 2025 at 13:09

Dusty Rogers

i used syncswap for a week just to see if it’d get better. it didn’t. i’m not mad, just disappointed. i wanted to believe.

skydrome is the obvious choice. no drama, no failed txns, just works. why make it harder?

December 27, 2025 at 00:30

Vyas Koduvayur

let’s be real - syncswap’s entire model is flawed. they’re trying to be a multi-chain DEX without having the dev resources to properly maintain even one chain.

look at their zkSync version - that one’s actually decent. but scroll? they threw it together like an afterthought. no independent audit? no liquidity incentives? no team updates in months?

the only reason anyone’s still talking about this is the airdrop rumor. and even that’s a mirage. mexc blog isn’t a whitepaper, it’s a marketing tweet.

if you’re not trading on skydrome right now, you’re not trading - you’re just donating gas to a ghost.

and don’t get me started on how they’re copying uniswap’s UI like it’s 2021. it’s not innovation, it’s laziness with a blockchain sticker on it.

the real question isn’t ‘should you use syncswap?’ - it’s ‘why are we still letting this exist?’

we need to stop rewarding half-baked projects just because they say ‘zkrollup’ in the readme. the market doesn’t care about tech buzzwords. it cares about reliability. skydrome delivers. syncswap? it’s a demo that never got to beta.

December 27, 2025 at 18:39

Helen Pieracacos

so… you’re telling me the only reason to use syncswap is a maybe-auction? wow. what a brilliant business model. i’ll just sit here and wait for my digital lottery ticket.

brilliant.

December 28, 2025 at 08:19